Bajaj, D; Oluwoye, J and Lenard, D (1997) An analysis of contractors' approaches to risk identification in New South Wales, Australia. Construction Management and Economics, 15(4), pp. 363-369. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
This study addresses the process of risk identification at the tendering and estimating stage, which is the first stage of the risk management process, and for the risk management process be of benefit and for the project objectives to be achieved, the risk identification stage should be very detailed and thorough. The aim of this study is to identify, investigate and evaluate the process of risk identification at the tendering and estimating stage for construction contractors in the NSW region. The data for this were collected during the months of December '94 and January '95 using a sample survey of a cross-section of 19 construction contractors, and the results were analysed using frequency distribution. The results show that the most frequently used methods of risk identification are the top-down approach techniques, where the project is analysed from an overall point of view. Techniques based on top-down approach lead to guesswork in terms of contingency for risks accepted by the construction contractors. Bottom-up risk identification techniques are not popular except for a questionnaire and check-list approach. Also, it was unlikely that the contractors would discuss risk allocation with the clients. All the contractors interviewed agreed that when a risk identification process is followed it improves the accuracy of their estimates.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractor; estimating; risk identification; tendering |
| Index terms: | survey, risk identification, accuracy, questionnaire, New South Wales, estimating, construction contractor, frequency distribution, Australia, risk management, risk allocation, estimate |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, professional development, financial risk, Geography, financial and cost management, practitioner, data collection methods, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here