Kim, S (1997) Organization and managerial environment of the Korean construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 15(5), pp. 409-419. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
In 1983, Korean construction contractors captured over 11% of the overseas market and twenty-five of them were listed in the top 250 international contractors. However, they have struggled against the inefficiency of their organizations, accelerating competition, and the rapid changes in the managerial environment. Although the various features of the environment had required variety in strategy and organization structure, the managers of construction firms have not kept pace with the requirement, but have shown an inability to predict what kind of influence the changes will have on their organizations and what kind of response is proper to the environmental changes they confront. These problems are mainly caused by a lack of understanding of the suitability of their organization's structure and managerial environment. The present research shows that: the functional structure is the archetype of the Korean construction organizations; direction and delegation are the mainstream in corporate management; the critical factors for corporate management are accelerating competition, inconsistent government policy and the pressure of rising costs; and most of the contractors, except the top 5% large-sized firms, have little capability to respond to a new environment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Korean construction industry; managerial environment; organization structure; organizational life cycle |
| Index terms: | life cycle, critical factor, construction organization, construction industry, environmental change, government policy, archetype, strategy, construction firm, manager, construction contractor, suitability, competition |
| Subjects: | organization, risk assessment, value management, practitioner, climate science, modelling and simulation, public policy, management, market analysis, industry analysis, design criteria |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Governance, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here