Preece, C and Male, S (1997) Promotional literature for competitive advantage in UK construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 15(1), pp. 59-69. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
This paper outlines the findings of an in-depth survey exploring the effective use of promotional brochures and other corporate literature in providing a competitive advantage in the marketing of contractual services in construction. The research project on which this paper is based involved surveys of major client organizations and their professional advisers, i.e. architects, engineers, project managers etc., who provided constructive criticism of the promotional efforts of contracting firms. The research also involved the senior marketing management responsible for promotion in construction firms, and promotional design consultants and agents employed by the industry to produce promotional brochures and other material. The principal findings are that construction firms need to give more attention to the careful targeting of their promotional literature to specific members of the client's team, tailoring material to the particular needs of the client and proposed project, and trimming material so that it concisely communicates a persuasive message concerning the firms' corporate image and the benefits of a clearly differentiated service. The paper presents practical recommendations based on the analysis for the more effective use of brochures and annual reports as part of the promotional strategies in the provision of construction contractual services.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competitive advantage; construction; marketing; promotion |
| Index terms: | construction firm, client organization, survey, annual report, strategy, agent, promotion, project manager, competitive advantage, engineer, marketing, architect |
| Subjects: | management, market analysis, business, organization, client relations, data collection methods, profession, practitioner |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Governance, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here