Ruge, G and McCormack, C (2017) Building and construction students' skills development for employability: reframing assessment for learning in discipline-specific contexts. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 13(5), pp. 365-383. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
The international debate on student skills development for employability has advanced institutional initiatives for teaching and learning, but to date lacks detailed research studies mapping disciplinary implementation linked to student learning feedback. This paper reports on a five year higher education research study from Australia framed by a reflective practice-based methodology. Students in the undergraduate discipline of building and construction management monitored the development of their academic attributes and skills for employability. This work contributes new knowledge on constructive alignment and implementation of assessment for learning and early professional skills development. Research findings indicate that student skills for employability are facilitated through: (1) Discipline-based curriculum design linking university and industry skills expectations. (2) Clear interweaving of learning contexts and assessments for students to experience and identify academic and professional learning dimensions (metacognition). (3) Constructive alignment for skills development through scaffolded assessment learning. (4) A 'constructive, explicit and reflective' teaching approach engaging students in their own generic and professional skills development.The international debate on student skills development for employability has advanced institutional initiatives for teaching and learning, but to date lacks detailed research studies mapping disciplinary implementation linked to student learning feedback. This paper reports on a five year higher education research study from Australia framed by a reflective practice-based methodology. Students in the undergraduate discipline of building and construction management monitored the development of their academic attributes and skills for employability. This work contributes new knowledge on constructive alignment and implementation of assessment for learning and early professional skills development. Research findings indicate that student skills for employability are facilitated through: (1) Discipline-based curriculum design linking university and industry skills expectations. (2) Clear interweaving of learning contexts and assessments for students to experience and identify academic and professional learning dimensions (metacognition). (3) Constructive alignment for skills development through scaffolded assessment learning. (4) A 'constructive, explicit and reflective' teaching approach engaging students in their own generic and professional skills development.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | assessment for learning; graduate employability; graduate skills; constructive alignment; authentic learning; learning; construction; skill development; students; higher education; architecture; feedback; reflective practice; construction management; discipline; research and development; universities |
| Index terms: | graduate employability, skills development, higher education, Australia, reflective practice, employability, dimension, implementation, research and development, authentic learning, mapping, undergraduate, methodology, assessment for learning, graduate skill |
| Subjects: | personnel development, professional development, Geography, research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, education, human resources and leadership, educational institutions, research management, learning methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, curriculum development, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Education, Health and Safety, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here