Choosing an appropriate research methodology

Walker, D H T (1997) Choosing an appropriate research methodology. Construction Management and Economics, 15(2), pp. 149-159. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The choice of research methodology is a difficult step in the research process. By way of a case study, the approach adopted in one PhD study is explored. The research project involved a detailed study of 33 building projects constructed in Melbourne during the period 1987 to 1993. The principal research objective was to understand better why some buildings are constructed faster than others, by identifying risk factors and how construction managers respond to them. Multiple regression analysis was used to derive a model that predicts construction time from a representative sample of projects. The performance model was then used to compare predicted with actual construction project duration to develop a construction time performance index. This performance ratio was then used to compare 102 variable factors by testing the null hypothesis that each variable does not affect construction time performance (at the 95% confidence level). Correlation analysis of all identified variables was also undertaken to link associations between factors for those affecting and not affecting construction time performance. The contribution of this paper is to identify one research approach for a specific research problem within the construction discipline so that others may be aware of this when making a choice of methodologies for pursuing their own research work.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: case study; research methodology
Index terms: methodology, construction project, construction manager, multiple regression analysis, risk factor, research methodology, duration, testing, construction time, case study, correlation analysis
Subjects: professional practice, research design and methodology, data collection methods, profession, environmental hazards, statistical analysis, project controls, production management, research methods
Topics: Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here