Clarke, L and Wall, C (1998) UK construction skills in the context of European developments. Construction Management and Economics, 16(5), pp. 553-567. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
A critical examination is made of the ways in which UK construction skills training contributes to and diverges from the dynamic of European developments. In identifying aspects increasingly shared by different countries, the paper is intended to help in the formulation of a common training policy. These aspects include: (i) comprehensive training systems covering all aspects of construction work on site and subsumed under broad skill groupings, with the 'traditional trades' assuming a 'universal' character and labourers becoming a residual category; (ii) three locations for learning - the college, the site and the training workshop - with increasing prominence being given to workshops and trainee sites; (ii) a modular training system with broad-based foundation followed by gradual specialization; (iv) social partnership between employers and employees in the regulation of training, the maintenance of skill standards, and the administering of the industrial levy; (v) training and skill categories linked to wage grades, so providing an incentive to training and further training, and recognized additionally through certification; (vi) training for life, with greater emphasis on adult and further training; and (vii) equality of access to training and employment in construction to open up this largely white male preserve. The UK construction training system is out of step with many of these developments, being employer-led, largely confined to the traditional trades and dominated by qualifications broken into narrow task-related units. Nevertheless, a framework still exists which, if built on, would bring the UK training system into line with European developments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Europe; labour; skills; training |
| Index terms: | regulation, specialization, certification, construction work, employment, skill category, partnership, Europe, becoming, qualification, workshop |
| Subjects: | business, construction type, operations management, educational resources, management, physical geography and landforms, professional development, partnership management, political science, philosophical process, administrative processes |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Contract Administration, Education, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here