Li, H and Love, P E D (1998) Developing a theory of construction problem solving. Construction Management and Economics, 16(6), pp. 721-727. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Construction problem solving characterizes much of construction management practice and thus is an important research domain. Nonetheless, research in construction problem solving has not yet crossed the threshold into a mature discipline as there is no universally accepted theory for construction problem solving research. In exploring the possibility of establishing such a theory, this paper reviews existing research works in two important research categories: cognitive science and decision support systems. A strategy for building a theory for construction problem solving, focusing on the existing models and techniques developed in the two research categories, is proposed. Future research needs and opportunities are identified.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cognitivism; decision support systems; information processing; problem solving |
| Index terms: | decision support, strategy, science, problem solving, management practice, information processing |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, management, decision-making and reasoning, data science, specialized education |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here