Wang, C H and Huang, Y C (1998) Controlling activity interval times in LOB scheduling. Construction Management and Economics, 16(1), pp. 5-16. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
A new scheduling method is presented in this paper which overcomes the inability of the line of balance (LOB) method to control the interval times between adjacent activities in a repetitive construction unit. The interval times are analysed and then expressed as functions of the number of repetitive construction units, the difference between construction times of adjacent activities and the sequence of repetitive construction units. In order to overcome the LOB problem, this paper presents a new scheduling method, the multistage linear scheduling (MLS) method, based on the concept of a multistage decision process. With the MLS method, the project's completion time is smaller or equal to that estimated with the LOB method. The sum of construction times of each activity in all units is the same as that estimated with the LOB method. However, no interval times are generated. The adjacent activities in a repetitive construction unit can progress continuously (not allowed under the LOB method). Therefore, the MLS method can be used to schedule a repetitive project which has necessary practical constraints on the interval times. This results in the retention of construction quality, safety and efficiency.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | interval time; lob; mls; multistage linear scheduling; repetitive project; scheduling |
| Index terms: | line of balance, repetitive construction, scheduling, construction quality, construction time, retention, linear scheduling, efficiency, repetitive project, decision process, completion time |
| Subjects: | operations research, production management, management, project controls, building construction, quality assurance, decision analysis, performance management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Human Resources, Construction Technology, Project Management, Risk Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here