Risk response techniques employed currently for major projects

Baker, S; Ponniah, D and Smith, S (1999) Risk response techniques employed currently for major projects. Construction Management and Economics, 17(2), pp. 205-213. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Risk management is fundamental to the success of a major project. However, the variations in using risk management practices are considerable and are dependent on numerous factors such as the industry sector, the size of the project, and the stage in the project life cycle. One of the major constituents of successful risk control is the use of risk response. This paper concentrates on the choice and use of the most successful risk response techniques within the oil and gas industry and compares them with the use of those chosen by the construction industry. Results were ascertained through a survey of over one hundred companies within these two sectors by use of an extensive questionnaire. The main conclusions are that risk reduction as a response to assessed risks is most commonly used by both sectors; and that the construction industry concentrates almost exclusively on reduction of financial risk. It is proposed that the construction industry can benefit greatly from the more experienced oil and gas industry in managing technical risk which, with the advent of private funding, is likely to become a more predominant part of construction procurement.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: risk management; risk response
Index terms: questionnaire, variation, survey, risk response, industry sector, risk reduction, construction industry, oil and gas, construction procurement, risk management, funding, major project, life cycle
Subjects: strategic project management, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, value management, data collection methods, risk assessment, industry analysis, financial risk, contractual condition
Topics: Contract Administration, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Procurement, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here