Bekdik, B; Pörzgen, J; Bull, S S and Thuesen, C (2018) Modularising design processes of façades in Denmark: Re-exploring the use of design structure matrix. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14(1-2), pp. 95-108. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Modularity has shown great potential in the manufacturing industry, reducing order lead time and creating variety with limited resources. In the construction industry, the implementation of modularity has been limited to off-site production (OSP). The construction design process incorporates a substantial number of disciplines and stakeholders. Moreover, in the application OSP, the design phase is critical due to the necessity of freezing the design early in the process. This study explores the opportunities for optimising the design processes for OSP through the application of modularity. Framed by a large general contractor, the research is based on a case study of façade design, which is representative of design processes for OSP. Research is based on a theoretical framing within design management and modularity, combined with empirical material from 20 interviews and a two-hour-long workshop with a cross-functional design team. The findings were that (1) the application of a modularity perspective in design has the advantage of accelerating the execution process, as the workload and coordination are transferred to the design process, which, in turn, requires enhanced design management. (2) The design structure matrix (DSM), an approach for operationalising modularity theory, is a promising tool for planning and scheduling complex design processes. The DSM method successfully enabled the identification of dependencies and interfaces between the crucial cross-organisational design activities that are related to the façade design process. (3) The developed process modules are helpful to visualise and execute the process for both project participants and managers.Modularity has shown great potential in the manufacturing industry, reducing order lead time and creating variety with limited resources. In the construction industry, the implementation of modularity has been limited to off-site production (OSP). The construction design process incorporates a substantial number of disciplines and stakeholders. Moreover, in the application OSP, the design phase is critical due to the necessity of freezing the design early in the process. This study explores the opportunities for optimising the design processes for OSP through the application of modularity. Framed by a large general contractor, the research is based on a case study of façade design, which is representative of design processes for OSP. Research is based on a theoretical framing within design management and modularity, combined with empirical material from 20 interviews and a two-hour-long workshop with a cross-functional design team. The findings were that (1) the application of a modularity perspective in design has the advantage of accelerating the execution process, as the workload and coordination are transferred to the design process, which, in turn, requires enhanced design management. (2) The design structure matrix (DSM), an approach for operationalising modularity theory, is a promising tool for planning and scheduling complex design processes. The DSM method successfully enabled the identification of dependencies and interfaces between the crucial cross-organisational design activities that are related to the façade design process. (3) The developed process modules are helpful to visualise and execute the process for both project participants and managers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | modularity in construction; design process; prefabricated façades; design structure matrix; off-site production; modular construction; construction; modular design; construction sites; modularity; freezing; research and development; construction industry; manufacturing industry; design optimization; case studies; lead time; design; interfaces; architectural engineering; lead |
| Index terms: | organizational design, design process, scheduling, case study, workshop, manager, interview, framing, design structure matrix, workload, freezing, general contractor, construction site, modularity, design team, manufacturing industry, lead time, design phase, module, off-site production, modular design, design management, modular construction, architectural engineering, research and development, coordination, design optimization, Denmark, implementation, construction industry |
| Subjects: | business, data collection methods, construction type, design methods, practitioner, work location, operations research, professional practice, environmental science, contractual arrangements, conceptual models, management, manufacturing engineering, architectural elements, design practice, design process, Geography, building construction, research management, project controls, design flexibility, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Site Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here