Boussabaine, A H and Elhag, T (1999) Applying fuzzy techniques to cash flow analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 17(6), pp. 745-755. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Construction managers are interested in the direction of movement of cash flow at valuation periods rather than its forecast value, and fuzzy set theory applied to decision making might help in this process. Fuzzy models are particularly suited to making decisions involving new technologies where uncertainties inherent in the situation are complex. The problem of healthy cash flow at valuation periods relates to the proper estimation of cash in and out flows and project progress. The paper presents an alternative approach to cash flow analysis for construction projects. This project is based on the assumption that cash flow at particular valuation stages of a project is ambiguous. The paper discusses the weaknesses of existing methods for cash flow and establishes the need for an alternative approach. Using an example of 30 cash flow curves, the advantage of fuzzy cash flow analysis is demonstrated. Results of the analysis are presented and discussed. The model can be used to analyse the cash flow curve of projects at any progress period to make sure it is reasonable.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cash flow; fuzzy; fuzzy techniques; progress; valuation |
| Index terms: | new technology, construction project, decision-making, fuzzy set theory, construction manager, cash flow, estimation, movement, cash flow analysis |
| Subjects: | innovation and technology management, health behaviours and lifestyles, decision analysis, financial management, financial and cost management, financial analysis, production management, decision-making and optimization, profession |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here