Bubshait, A A; Farooq, G; Jannadi, M O and Assaf, S A (1999) Quality practices in design organizations. Construction Management and Economics, 17(6), pp. 799-809. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Design organizations play a major role in the construction industry: they are the media that transfer the requirements of the client to the contractor and ensure that they are met. Thus they need to provide a high quality of service to ensure that their client's project achieves the best possible standards of cost, time and quality. Seventy quality practices (QP) were identified as having a bearing on the quality of service provided by the local design organizations. These quality practices were grouped into fifteen sections termed quality sections (QS). The prevalence of these practices among the local design organizations was surveyed and determined. The results indicate a significant need for improvement in the quality sections 'working relationship', 'employee training and education', and 'performance quality audit'. The study reveals the need for the establishment of a design code, and evaluation standards for local design organizations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design organizations; quality practices; Saudi Arabia |
| Index terms: | Saudi Arabia, quality audit, media, quality of service, construction industry |
| Subjects: | sociology, industry analysis, quality assurance, public and environmental health, Geography |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here