A participative research strategy for propagating soft methodologies in value management practice

Green, S D (1999) A participative research strategy for propagating soft methodologies in value management practice. Construction Management and Economics, 17(3), pp. 329-340. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The emerging methodologies of 'soft operational research' have been developed for the purposes of structuring multi-perspective problems characterized by uncertainty, ambiguity and conflict. A participative research project is reported that sought to propagate the three most established 'soft' methodologies within UK value management practice. The adopted research strategy consisted of four key stages. Following an initial literature review, an insight into existing value management was gained by twelve semi-structured interviews with leading practitioners. This was followed by a series of six participative research seminars which used simulated case studies to evaluate the potential application of the three methodologies within the context of value management. A final series of interviews then determined the extent to which the three methodologies subsequently had been adopted in practice. The results are encouraging in that already the research has had an influence on UK value management practice. However, doubts remain as to whether the practitioners have assimilated the methodologies fully, or simply have adopted individual techniques in the absence of any theoretical understanding.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: briefing; group decision support; participative research; risk management; soft operational research; value management
Index terms: strategy, literature review, decision support, interview, briefing, practitioner, methodology, operational research, participative research, case study, risk management, value management
Subjects: decision analysis, management, research methods, data analysis and analytics, practitioner, scope management, risk assessment, data collection methods, social issues and equity
Topics: Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Value Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here