Green, S D and Simister, S J (1999) Modelling client business processes as an aid to strategic briefing. Construction Management and Economics, 17(1), pp. 63-76. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The briefing process can be divided into two stages. The first is referred to as strategic briefing and is concerned with understanding the client's business processes. The second stage comprises the conceptualization of built solutions and issues of performance specification. It is the first of these two stages which often is the most problematic. Several authors have established a relationship between strategic briefing and business process re-engineering (BPR), but doubts remain regarding both the originality of BPR and the extent of its theoretical justification. A social constructivist interpretation of BPR is presented and the connection is made with soft systems methodology (SSM). It is argued that SSM offers a rigorous framework for modelling client business processes which subsumes the principles of BPR. A participative research seminar is described which evaluates the potential use of SSM using case study material. Feedback from the seminar participants provides strong support for the contention that SSM could indeed provide the basis for a significant enhancement of current briefing practice. However, there is a danger that practitioners may adopt the techniques of SSM without necessarily buying in at the methodology level. The terminology of SSM also is likely to present a barrier to those construction professionals who are unwilling to make the necessary intellectual investment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | briefing; business process re-engineering; clients; social constructivism; soft systems methodology |
| Index terms: | briefing, practitioner, methodology, performance specification, soft systems methodology, business process re-engineering, modelling, construction professional, participative research, case study |
| Subjects: | professional development, research methods, tendering, practitioner, scope management, business, social issues and equity, data collection methods, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Procurement, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here