Cardellino, P; Araneda, C and García Alvarado, R (2018) Interventions in the classroom–the influence of spatial organisation on educational interaction in Uruguay. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14(6), pp. 413-426. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
This paper presents an intervention that seeks to examine how changes to the spatial organisation of traditional classrooms affect the number of pupils able to interact with the teacher, as well as the quality of this interaction. The experimental design allows for investigation of variations between a 'traditional' and new classroom set-ups. This study focuses on visual relation as well as auditory interaction and pupil movement in the classroom. They are discussed in the context of four primary classroom settings in Uruguay. The method derives from a hybrid approach using photographic and video records, teacher–pupil distance information and interviews with teachers. The conclusions show that alterations to the sitting layout and proportion of the classroom space increase the number of pupils in interaction with the teacher. However, it also suggests that optimising one variable in the study compromises other variables such as possibilities of movement in the classroom. It is suggested that in order to increase the number of pupils in quality interaction with the teacher the spatial arrangement of the classroom needs to be given prominence. Ultimately, the replication of the method across a wider variety of classroom types could help teachers identify areas for early intervention and micromanagement of classrooms as well as help nurture and inform future design decisions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | classroom design; educational interaction; schools; spatial organisation |
| Index terms: | experimental design, Uruguay, interview, investigation, design decision, movement, pupil, variation, classroom, interaction |
| Subjects: | contractual condition, data collection methods, design practice, research design and methodology, health behaviours and lifestyles, Geography, sociology, construction type, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Contract Administration, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here