Modelling financial decisions in construction firms

Lam, K A and Runeson, G (1999) Modelling financial decisions in construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 17(5), pp. 589-602. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Some contractors predict their corporate cash flow on the basis of individual contracts without considering the relationships between the overall before-tax profit, risks, other crucial qualitative factors, or the allocation of resources within the company. Moreover, some contractors, in predicting their cash flow, focus only on the early-start progress in the project and their predictions of progress are too pessimistic, or result in the overuse of resource in order to make up for delays. In the present research a decision model is established for a contracting firm. It provides a methodical system for construction financial decision-making, and a way of solving a financial decision problem under qualitative and fuzzy circumstances. The model can be applied to the management of corporate cash flow, thereby facilitating the minimal use of resources. The information provided by the model allows the planner to eliminate excess use or idleness of resources during the scheduling of a project. Financial forecasting may also suggest the best time to invest in a new project. Four projects for a medium size construction firm in Hong Kong were employed as case studies in order to evaluate the mathematical model. The cases involve two objectives: maximize profit margin and minimize construction risk (consider in a qualitative factor). The model leads to a compromise optimal schedule that provides the contracting firm with the optimal schedule for achieving optimal profit and construction risk by making optimal use of the contractor's resources.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cash flow; fuzzy; multiple-objectives; optimization; qualitative
Index terms: decision-making, construction firm, profit, scheduling, mathematical model, cash flow, modelling, qualitative factor, planner, case study, forecasting, Hong Kong
Subjects: profession, data collection methods, organization, mathematical modelling, data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, prediction and forecasting, analytical methods, operations research, Geography, financial management, decision analysis
Topics: Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here