Craft versus industry: The division of labour in European housing construction

Clarke, L and Wall, C (2000) Craft versus industry: The division of labour in European housing construction. Construction Management and Economics, 18(6), pp. 689-698. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Two distinct divisions and concepts of labour are apparent from an analysis of social housebuilding sites in the UK, Germany and the Netherlands: the craft form, based on controlling the output of labour; and the industry form, based on the quality of labour input. These are associated with different work processes, skills and training, and also different levels of mechanization and component prefabrication. In the UK, which is craft-based, low levels of mechanization and prefabrication were found compared with Germany and the Netherlands, and the range of activities for the separate trades in assembling superstructure elements was simpler. Labourers are distinct from craftsmen and remain a significant group. Skills are narrow and training provision low. A high proportion of the labour force remains self-employed, under labour-only subcontractors, working to price or output. In comparison, in Germany and the Netherlands labour is employed directly and work processes are more complex, with more specialisms at the interfaces. The division of labour is industry-wide, training provision is extensive, and skills are broad and integrated into the grading structure. Greater speed, higher productivity and lower levels of supervision are associated with industry-wide systems compared with traditional craft forms.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: craft; Europe; housebuilding; skills; training
Index terms: craft worker, Germany, housebuilding, low level, division of labour, labour force, Netherlands, Europe, subcontractor, supervision, residential construction, prefabrication, productivity
Subjects: practitioner, Geography, business economics, construction integration, management, physical geography and landforms, economics, building construction, control systems, measurement and scaling
Topics: Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Project Management, Supply Chain Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here