Benchmarking for construction: Theory and practice

Garnett, N and Pickrell, S (2000) Benchmarking for construction: Theory and practice. Construction Management and Economics, 18(1), pp. 55-63. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The UK construction industry has identified benchmarking as one of a number of initiatives to assist in the drive for major improvements in efficiency and economy. At the outset, the industry struggled to see how a technique based upon comparison of similar goods and processes could be used effectively in a project based industry where products, processes and teams changed regularly. This paper discusses the development and testing of a benchmarking model and study methodology for use in construction. The model was derived from an extensive literature review which considered the underlying theoretical basis of benchmarking. The case is made that, to be successful, the benchmarking process is as important as the benchmarks themselves, and that it is based upon constructivist foundations, rather than positivist. As such, any methodology for undertaking benchmarking must take place in a similar vein, i.e. be interactive, team based and flexible but with an underlying rigour provided by the benchmarking model. The paper outlines two case studies to test the benchmarking model and study methodology, discusses the learning and benefits that accrued and introduces further developments.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: benchmarking methodology; case studies; process mapping; social constructivism
Index terms: methodology, mapping, benchmarking, literature review, foundations, construction industry, testing, project-based industry, efficiency, case study
Subjects: industry analysis, performance management, spatial and geospatial analysis, research methods, structural engineering, performance measurement, data analysis and analytics, professional practice, organization, data collection methods
Topics: Quality Management, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here