Hua, G B and Pin, T H O (2000) Forecasting construction industry demand, price and productivity in Singapore: The Box-Jenkins approach. Construction Management and Economics, 18(5), pp. 607-618. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
In academic research, the traditional Box-Jenkins approach is widely acknowledged as a benchmark technique for univariate methods because of its structured modelling basis and acceptable forecasting performance. This study examines the versatility of this approach by applying it to analyse and forecast three distinct variables of the construction industry, namely, tender price, construction demand and productivity, based on case studies of Singapore. In order to assess the adequacy of the Box-Jenkins approach to construction industry forecasting, the models derived are evaluated on their predictive accuracy based on out-of-sample forecasts. Two measures of accuracy are adopted, the root mean-square-error (RMSE) and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The conclusive findings of the study include: (1) the prediction RMSE of all three models is consistently smaller than the model's standard error, implying the models' good predictive performance; (2) the prediction MAPE of all three models consistently falls within the general acceptable limit of 10%; and (3) among the three models, the most accurate is the demand model which has the lowest MAPE, followed by the price model and the productivity model.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; box-jenkins approach; construction demand; forecasting; productivity; tender price |
| Index terms: | accuracy, tender price, Box-Jenkins, construction demand, construction industry, modelling, case study, forecasting, Singapore, falls, productivity |
| Subjects: | tendering, health risk and incident analysis, management, professional development, Geography, market analysis, industry analysis, data collection methods, analytical methods, prediction and forecasting |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here