The European construction industry and its competitiveness: A construct of the European commission

Janssen, J (2000) The European construction industry and its competitiveness: A construct of the European commission. Construction Management and Economics, 18(6), pp. 711-720. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The 'European construction industry' is a fiction that tends to obscure its heterogeneous character and to mar studies and policies of the European Commission aimed at improving the internal and external 'competitiveness' of the sector. In order to assess the process of integration in Europe under the impact of its own dynamics as well as Union policies, this paper looks at the dynamics of the sector from three different aspects: as investment, production and labour process. It shows, in particular, the persistent regional and social disparities dividing the industry into separate entities. Political attention tends to focus on a small number of construction companies competing for a few projects which represent the European dimension. Yet, these companies still rely on their respective national bases and local labour from the place where construction is carried out. Persistent divisions between the states are also reflected in the low level of transnational organization of the construction industry. The policy of the European Commission generally ignores these divisions and attempts to establish principles intended to make a whole sector more 'competitive', while its component parts, operating at hugely different levels of productivity, do not even meet on the same market. This paper argues that, instead of trying in vain to introduce a 'knock-out' system of competition in the EU Member States, a targeted approach might help raise productivity in lagging regions and thus improve the basis of competitiveness on global markets.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: competitiveness; construction industry; disparities; european commission; productivity
Index terms: productivity, low level, Europe, construction industry, markets, disparity, dimension, competitiveness, dynamics, construction company, competition, integration
Subjects: health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis, organization, industry analysis, systems engineering, organizational analysis, market analysis, measurement and scaling, social justice, management, physical geography and landforms
Topics: Organizational Design, Ethics, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here