Construction ecology and metabolism: Natural system analogues for a sustainable built environment

Kibert, C J; Sendzimir, J and Guy, B (2000) Construction ecology and metabolism: Natural system analogues for a sustainable built environment. Construction Management and Economics, 18(8), pp. 903-916. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Applying the principles of sustainability to human activities ultimately must result in the scrutiny of all sectors of economic activity to assess the changes required to provide for a high quality of life for future generations. A high priority for evaluation, in the light of its impacts on environmental quality and resources, is industrial activity in general and the construction industry specifically. The construction sector consumes 40% of all extracted materials in the USA, and accounts for 30% of national energy consumption for its operation. The sustainability of this industrial sector is dependent on a fundamental shift in the way resources are used, from non-renewables to renewables, from high levels of waste to high levels of reuse and recycling, and from products based on lowest first cost to those based on life-cycle costs and full cost accounting, especially as applied to waste and emissions from the industrial processes that support construction activity. The emerging field of industrial ecology provides some insights into sustainability in the built environment or sustainable construction. Construction, like other industries, would benefit from observing the metabolic behaviour of natural systems where sustainability is built in. This paper describes a view of the construction industry based on natural systems and industrial ecology for the purpose of beginning the discovery of how to shift the construction industry and its supporting materials industries onto a path much closer to the ideals of sustainability.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction ecology; construction metabolism; design for the environment; industrial ecology; industrial metabolism; resource efficiency; sustainability; sustainable construction
Index terms: sustainable construction, quality of life, accounting, construction sector, ecology, recycling, construction activity, built environment, environmental quality, energy consumption, resource efficiency, human activity, construction industry, economic activity
Subjects: economic analysis, energy systems, environmental science, construction operations, waste management, sociology, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, public and environmental health, management, sustainability assessment, sustainable construction
Topics: Urban Studies, Site Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here