Kaçel, S and Lau, B (2018) Louis I. Kahn and Richard Kelly: Collaborative design in creation of the luminous environment. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14(4), pp. 306-316. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
As one of the most prominent architects of the twentieth century, Louis I. Kahn aspired to use natural light to shape his architecture. The lighting designer Richard Kelly, one of his close collaborators, had significant influence on modern architectural lighting design in the twentieth century. Kahn and Kelly designed the luminous environments in three art-gallery and museum buildings, The Yale University Art Gallery, the Kimbell Art Museum and the Yale Center for British Art. Collaboration between the architect and the lighting designer resulted in well-resolved lighting solutions. This research investigated the collaboration between Louis I. Kahn and Richard Kelly from both theoretical and pragmatic perspectives. In terms of the theoretical perspective, a detailed overview of their collaborative work is provided through literature review. In terms of the pragmatic perspective, the background of their cooperation and the technical details are presented. In addition, daylighting performance analysis of these three buildings through digital modelling was undertaken. This study found that the lighting design solutions produced together by Louis I. Kahn and Richard Kelly, especially the way of using daylight, have had significant impact on architectural space and the luminous environment. More importantly, this kind of collaborative working method could provide a useful reference and guidance for contemporary architecture and lighting design.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaborative lighting design; daylight modelling; louis i. kahn; luminous environment; richard kelly |
| Index terms: | collaborative design, architect, digital-modelling, collaboration, natural light, modelling, cooperation, daylighting, performance analysis, literature review, designer |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, building performance, management, digital design, profession, data analysis and analytics, psychology, design methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here