Hybrid modelling framework for synthesizing virtual structures

Manavazhi, M R (2000) Hybrid modelling framework for synthesizing virtual structures. Construction Management and Economics, 18(4), pp. 415-426. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Erecting a structure in a construction project involves the use of a number of complex, interacting processes. Systematic analysis of these processes is essential for ensuring that they are executed in the most efficient way possible. However, traditional tools like CPM and PERT and other analytical and mathematical approaches cannot capture the dynamics of construction processes. These problems could be overcome by conducting experiments on the real-world processes themselves but such experiments can be prohibitively expensive. Thus, a more feasible approach that can overcome these drawbacks is required. This paper presents a framework-based approach for facilitating the analyses of the operations required for the construction of a structure with a specific configuration by building the structure virtually in a digital computer using discrete-event simulation. The approach utilizes a hybrid framework that combines the flexibility and simplicity of semantic networks with the power of object-orientation to facilitate discrete-event simulation. A predominantly product-centric modelling approach is used in the development of the framework. A sample application is given illustrating the application of the framework-based approach for the analyses of the operations required for the construction of the structure.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: discrete-event simulation; object-oriented simulation; product modelling; product synthesis; semantic networks
Index terms: modelling, construction project, construction process, experiment, configuration, dynamics
Subjects: systems engineering, data collection methods, building construction, analytical methods, production management
Topics: Research Practice, Site Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here