How does sustainability certification affect the design process? Mapping final design projects at an architectural office

Landgren, M and Jensen, L B (2018) How does sustainability certification affect the design process? Mapping final design projects at an architectural office. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14(4), pp. 292-305. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

The context of the study is the very strict regulation of energy consumption for operating buildings in Denmark. It is difficult to meet the requirements by system optimisation in the final design phase, so recent research has focused on ways of meeting the target by adapting the whole design process and informing the industry of them. This has led to optimised design processes such as Integrated Energy Design, in which many decisions related to energy consumption and indoor climate are made in the early design stages. The current tendency is to use an expanded notion of sustainability, derived from the sustainability certification system itself, and to apply it even in the early design process. This perspective emphasises all phases of the life cycle of a building. The goal of the present study was to map how a Danish architectural office approached sustainability in the projects they undertook in the course of a year. All the projects concerned were intended to conform to the German Sustainability Certification System DGNB. We developed a mapping tool to document these case projects and found that different sets of certification criteria were used in each project. This demonstrates the complexity of using them as design parameters in practice, but also that it was successfully achieved.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: case study; dgnb; integrated energy design; mapping; sustainability
Index terms: Denmark, complexity, early design stage, mapping, energy consumption, indoor climate, design phase, regulation, design parameter, life cycle, case study, design process, certification
Subjects: spatial and geospatial analysis, design process, Geography, design constraints, political science, systems engineering, administrative processes, data collection methods, design methods, value management, professional practice, environmental science, energy systems
Topics: Governance, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Contract Administration, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here