Smith, S D; Wood, G S and Gould, M (2000) A new earthworks estimating methodology. Construction Management and Economics, 18(2), pp. 219-228. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Earthworks and earthmoving operations are a major part of many civil engineering construction projects. Because of their labour and plant intensity, the planning and estimating of such operations is crucial to both the cost and duration of the project; earthworks are considered by many practitioners to be indicators to the success or failure of the project as a whole. Traditionally, a mixture of manufacturers' data (through published charts or computer databases) and historical company data are used in die estimating of earthworks. This process has two main drawbacks. First, plant haul velocity is dependent on the rolling resistance at the soil-wheel interface, which is notoriously difficult to determine; second, the stochastic interface between types of plant provides a non-deterministic system, resulting in estimates of output which may be unrealistically high. An alternative system of earthworks estimating is presented based on a combination of work undertaken in both the soil/vehicle and stochastic estimating fields. This system is demonstrated via a case study based on an actual highway project. The main conclusion to be drawn is that the traditional estimating approach results in a scheme costed well below realistic values.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | earthmoving plant; earthworks; hauling; plant cycle times; rolling resistance |
| Index terms: | earthwork, manufacturer, methodology, construction project, practitioner, estimating, case study, database, highway construction, estimate, earthmoving, duration |
| Subjects: | research methods, civil engineering, production management, data management, project controls, data collection methods, practitioner, construction methods, financial and cost management, construction operations |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Time Control, Site Management, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here