Liu, Y; Messner, J I and Leicht, R M (2018) A process model for usability and maintainability design reviews. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14(6), pp. 457-469. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Most of the previous research on design reviews focuses on management and technology innovations that improve the effectiveness of design reviews. To better evaluate the impact of those innovations, a structured view of the design review process is needed, but few previous works have provided such a view. This research studies the dynamics of usability and maintainability design review meetings that involve stakeholders in the post-occupancy phase of the building, including owners, occupants, and facility operators. The outcomes of the research include a process model, which describes the communication and interaction dynamics between the participants in those design reviews. The process model is developed and validated following grounded theory methodology through analyzing 20.5 h of the video recordings from 13 design review meetings, which are from real projects with diverse sizes and types. The process model defines the core of the design review process as three cycles of activities, which are called Understand, Validate, and Resolve Cycle respectively. The process model also defines the interactions among activity cycles and how they advance the design review process. This research contributes to the fundamental theory of design review process and provides a roadmap for other researchers to analyze the usability and maintainability design reviews. To further support future researchers' evaluation of design review process, we also proposed a theory to derive the design review meeting performance by analyzing the time spent in each activity cycles. This theory can be used as a foundation by future researchers to evaluate and compare the impact of technology and process innovations on design reviews meetings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design review; process model |
| Index terms: | maintainability, usability, owner, grounded theory, technology innovation, methodology, dynamics, effectiveness, interaction |
| Subjects: | user-centered design, systems engineering, behavioral psychology, sociology, automation and robotics, performance management, research methods, maintenance engineering, theoretical framing |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here