Chiang, Y H; Tang, B S and Leung, W Y (2001) Market structure of the construction industry in Hong Kong. Construction Management and Economics, 19(7), pp. 675-687. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
This study examines the market structure of four different sectors within the construction industry in Hong Kong. Market concentrations, expressed in terms of Herfindahl-Hershamann indices (HHIs) and number equivalents (HNEs), are calibrated for the top five contractors and compared with those of the local property industry. The study reveals the following ascending order of market concentrations: private building, public building, property development, and civil engineering. Our explanation is that technological and capital requirements have imposed a strong barrier to entry into the civil engineering sector, resulting in a concentrated market. Conversely, the lack of technological demand and supply in the private building sector has led to easy market entry and exit. Building contractors thus compete intensely on cost reduction rather than technology improvement, leading to poor construction safety and product quality. The paper concludes that the Government, being a major client of construction works and regulator of the industry, can assume a more active role in promoting the overall competitiveness of indigenous local contractors in Hong Kong.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; herfindahl-hershamann indices; Hong Kong; market structure |
| Index terms: | cost reduction, public building, construction safety, local contractor, building contractor, Hong Kong, product quality, regulator, construction work, competitiveness, property development, construction industry, market entry |
| Subjects: | operations management, business, construction type, practitioner, sociology, market analysis, environmental health, quality assurance, industry analysis, economics, economic development, Geography |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here