Elbeltagi, E; Hegazy, T; Hosny, A H and Eldosouky, A (2001) Schedule-dependent evolution of site layout planning. Construction Management and Economics, 19(7), pp. 689-697. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The appropriate layout of temporary facilities on a construction site has a large impact on construction safety and productivity. For the duration of a project the site layout may need to be efficiently re-organized at various intervals to satisfy the schedule requirements and to maintain site efficiency. This paper presents a practical model for schedule-dependent site layout planning in construction. The proposed model uses a combination of artificial intelligence tools (knowledge-based systems, fuzzy logic, and genetic algorithms) to generate, optimize, and re-organize the site layout plan at frequent intervals during the project. The model incorporates flexible representation of irregular site shapes and several options for placing facilities. Based on the proposed model, an automated system is developed, fully integrated with widely used scheduling software. At each schedule interval, the system recalculates the space requirements and, for the convenience of congested sites, can utilize parts of the constructed space to accommodate temporary facilities. Details of the schedule-dependent model are described, and its application in an actual case study project is presented to demonstrate its capabilities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | material flow; quantitative evolution; site layout |
| Index terms: | site layout planning, duration, artificial intelligence tool, option, efficiency, construction safety, knowledge-based system, site layout, productivity, placing, genetic algorithm, evolution, construction site, scheduling, case study, fuzzy logic |
| Subjects: | data science, operations research, construction planning, site logistics, work location, algorithms, data collection methods, management, concrete and cementitious materials, project controls, environmental health, artificial intelligence, environmental science, decision analysis, performance management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Quality Management, Time Control, Construction Materials, Site Management, Research Practice, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here