Montali, J; Overend, M; Pelken, P M and Sauchelli, M (2018) Knowledge-based engineering in the design for manufacture of prefabricated façades: Current gaps and future trends. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14(1-2), pp. 78-94. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
The use of prefabricated façades provides a timely means to increase efficiency in the delivery of buildings, while maximising the expected environmental service performance. In order to achieve high performance and low cost, these products require manufacturability and supply chain knowledge to be integrated earlier than usual in the design process. Knowledge-Based Engineering (KBE) applications can potentially fulfil this need by providing a digital Product Model that informs designers about manufacturability aspects and expected performance. This paper explores the currently available digital tools, as well as KBE and its applicability in façade design. It is first demonstrated that there is a fundamental gap in state-of-the-art digital tools: rather than integrating design principles and manufacturing constraints, existing and emerging tools continue to focus on single disciplines with no consideration for the actual manufacturing stage. The applicability of KBE is then evaluated by reviewing the current use of this approach in the building and other industries, namely, aerospace and shipbuilding. It is found that, although KBE is rarely used in façade design, there are significant opportunities for it to be applied in this sector, due to the similarity in terms of design tasks and priorities with the two other industries reviewed in this paper.The use of prefabricated façades provides a timely means to increase efficiency in the delivery of buildings, while maximising the expected environmental service performance. In order to achieve high performance and low cost, these products require manufacturability and supply chain knowledge to be integrated earlier than usual in the design process. Knowledge-Based Engineering (KBE) applications can potentially fulfil this need by providing a digital Product Model that informs designers about manufacturability aspects and expected performance. This paper explores the currently available digital tools, as well as KBE and its applicability in façade design. It is first demonstrated that there is a fundamental gap in state-of-the-art digital tools: rather than integrating design principles and manufacturing constraints, existing and emerging tools continue to focus on single disciplines with no consideration for the actual manufacturing stage. The applicability of KBE is then evaluated by reviewing the current use of this approach in the building and other industries, namely, aerospace and shipbuilding. It is found that, although KBE is rarely used in façade design, there are significant opportunities for it to be applied in this sector, due to the similarity in terms of design tasks and priorities with the two other industries reviewed in this paper.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | product configuration; façade design; engineer-to-order; knowledge-based engineering; design for manufacture & assembly; knowledge based engineering; supply chains; design for manufacturability; knowledge base; aerospace industry; design; engineering; design engineering; reviews; low cost; prefabrication; manufacturability; manufacturing; shipbuilding |
| Index terms: | manufacturability, prefabrication, engineer-to-order, state of the art, aerospace industry, knowledge-based engineering, design for manufacture, shipbuilding, design principle, designer, low cost, design engineering, design for manufacturability, design process, product model, product configuration, efficiency, knowledge base |
| Subjects: | performance management, manufacturing engineering, structural engineering, information systems, industry analysis, building construction, design methods, research dissemination and communication, profession, bidding, knowledge management, modelling and simulation |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Procurement, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here