Fraser, C and Zarkada-Fraser, A (2001) The philosophy, structure and objectives of research and development in Japan. Construction Management and Economics, 19(8), pp. 831-840. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of the philosophy, structure and key objectives of R&D activity in the Japanese construction industry. It argues that this unique model of a close partnership between industry, government and society is based on shared values, and delivers significant benefits not only for firms but for society at large. Additionally, the Japanese system acts as an efficient market entry barrier that protects the Japanese domestic market from foreign competition while concurrently providing the basis of Japan's competitive advantage in international markets. To illustrate how significantly different the Japanese model is from those of other advanced economies, an empirical comparison of the belief structures concerning responsibility for R&D of key players in the construction industries in Japan and Australia is presented. The results illustrate the point that, unlike Australia, Japanese contractors play a much more extensive role in society than do their Australian counterparts. This role incongruence may be the true barrier to penetration of the Japanese construction market.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; contractor; international marketing; Japan; research and development |
| Index terms: | competitive advantage, Australia, partnership, international market, marketing, construction market, market entry, construction industry, penetration, society, shared value, philosophy, Japan, competition, research and development |
| Subjects: | Geography, development economics, philosophical studies, industry analysis, communities and social development, market analysis, partnership management, research management, equitable outcomes, business |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Organizational Design, Value Management, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here