Resource allocation heuristic in construction simulation

Hong, Z; Tam, C M and Shi, J J (2001) Resource allocation heuristic in construction simulation. Construction Management and Economics, 19(6), pp. 643-651. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The quantity of some resources is limited because of project cost constrains. These resources may be required by multiple activities simultaneously during a construction process. In a discrete simulation that models the construction process, tracing and controlling such entities, e.g. resources, is crucial to simulation. This paper presents a resource allocation point (RAP) heuristic that takes into account the dynamic and stochastic characteristics of simulation to enable the activity-based construction simulation system to process a decision-making ability, i.e. allocating the limited resources to the multiple computing activities during simulation. In addition, this paper introduces an activity object-orientated approach that implements the RAP heuristic and speeds up the simulation experimentation through initiating and checking only related activity objects instead of scanning all activities as in a pure activity scanning (AS) simulation strategy.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction simulation; decision-making; object-oriented approach; resource allocation heuristic; simulation strategy
Index terms: project cost, construction simulation, strategy, experiment, resource allocation, decision-making, construction process, heuristic, computing
Subjects: building construction, economics, data collection methods, decision analysis, modelling and simulation, risk assessment, computing systems, resource management, management
Topics: Cost Management, Site Management, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here