Isidore, L J; Back, W E and Fry, G T (2001) Integrated probabilistic schedules and estimates from project simulated data. Construction Management and Economics, 19(4), pp. 417-426. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Risk management, as it relates to construction, is vital to the successful undertaking and completion of any construction project. One way to manage project risk effectively is to develop more reliable means of accounting for the time and cost variability existing in construction operations. Recent attempts to more reliably quantify the risk inherent in construction projects has focused on range estimating and stochastic scheduling (also referred to as probabilistic estimating and probabilistic scheduling). It is common knowledge in the construction industry that the cost associated with a project is affected greatly by the schedule selected to complete that project. Additionally, the percentile level associated with both of these tools is of significance when they are considered stochastically. This paper looks at the integration of range estimating and probabilistic scheduling, using a new procedure called the empirical cumulative density function technique (ECDF) as a means of further controlling the risk associated with the undertaking of construction projects. In addition to providing a reliable means of relating the results of range estimating and probabilistic scheduling, this technique is graphically based, and has the advantage of not requiring any assumptions regarding the underlying data distributions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | integrated cost and schedule; Monte Carlo simulation; probabilistic estimating; probabilistic scheduling; range estimating |
| Index terms: | scheduling, data-distribution, estimating, accounting, integration, construction project, construction operation, Monte Carlo simulation, density, variability, construction industry, estimate, risk management |
| Subjects: | production management, data exchange, statistical analysis, industry analysis, organizational analysis, risk assessment, financial and cost management, analytical methods, economic analysis, construction operations, modelling and simulation, operations research |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Time Control, Site Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here