Lam, K C; Hu, T; Ng, S T; Skitmore, M and Cheoung, S O (2001) A fuzzy neural network approach for contractor prequalification. Construction Management and Economics, 19(2), pp. 175-188. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Non-linearity, uncertainty and subjectivity are the three predominant characteristics of contractors prequalification which lead to the process being more of an art than a scientific evaluation. A fuzzy neural network (FNN) model, amalgamating both the fuzzy set and neural network theories, has been developed aiming to improve the objectiveness of contractor prequalification. Through FNN theory, the fuzzy rules as used by the prequalifiers can be identified and the corresponding membership functions can be transformed. Eighty-five cases with detailed decision criteria and rules for prequalifying Hong Kong civil engineering contractors were collected. These cases were used for training (calibrating) and testing the FNN model. The performance of the FNN model was compared with the original results produced by the prequalifiers and those generated by the general feedforward neural network (GFNN, i.e. a crisp neural network) approach. Contractors' ranking orders, the model efficiency (R2) and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were examined during the testing phase. These results indicate the applicability of the neural network approach for contractor prequalification and the benefits of the FNN model over the GFNN model. The fuzzy neural network is a practical approach for modelling contractor prequalification.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractor prequalification; fuzzy reasoning; neural network |
| Index terms: | reasoning, neural network, subjectivity, feedforward, decision criteria, modelling, testing, engineering contractor, efficiency, Hong Kong, fuzzy set |
| Subjects: | Geography, firms, performance management, decision-making and optimization, cognitive psychology, decision analysis, human factors and perception, control systems, analytical methods, artificial intelligence, professional practice |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here