Assessing management and performance of sinoforeign construction joint ventures

Luo, J (2001) Assessing management and performance of sinoforeign construction joint ventures. Construction Management and Economics, 19(1), pp. 109-117. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Since the early 1990s, construction joint ventures are developing and evolving rapidly in China. However, there has been relatively little empirical research into Sino-foreign JVs in China's construction industry. This study investigates the management and operating performance of Sino-foreign construction joint ventures, and the relationships between ownership, management control and JV performance. It is found that dominant management control over JVs by Chinese partners is the major form of management. Sino-foreign construction JVs perform well. Positive and significant correlations were found to exist between three variables - ownership, management control and JV performance. A valid measure is developed in assessing JV's performance in terms of JV's social role in developing countries. The relationship between partner's participation in daily operational management of JV and the level of control over JV exercised by their parent company, and the relationship between partner's strategic objectives and the selection of JV organizational structure are also discussed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: China; construction industry; jv assessment; management control; performance
Index terms: China, organizational structure, developing country, construction industry, ownership, joint venture
Subjects: business, economics, development economics, Geography, sociology, industry analysis
Topics: International Construction, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here