Treloar, G J; Love, P E D and Holt, G D (2001) Using national input–output data for embodied energy analysis of individual residential buildings. Construction Management and Economics, 19(1), pp. 49-61. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Embodied energy (EE) analysis has become an important area of energy research, in attempting to trace the direct and indirect energy requirements of products and services throughout their supply chain. Typically, input–output (I–O) models have been used to calculate EE because they are considered to be comprehensive in their analysis. However, a major deficiency of using I–O models is that they have inherent errors and therefore cannot be reliably applied to individual cases. Thus, there is a need for the ability to disaggregate an I–O model into its most important 'energy paths', for the purpose of integrating case-specific data. This paper presents a new hybrid method for conducting EE analyses for individual buildings, which retains the completeness of the I–O model. This new method is demonstrated by application to an Australian residential building. Only 52% of the energy paths derived from the I–O model were substituted using case-specific data. This indicates that previous system boundaries for EE studies of individual residential buildings are less than optimal. It is envisaged that the proposed method will provide construction professionals with more accurate and reliable data for conducting life cycle energy analysis of buildings. Furthermore, by analysing the unmodified energy paths, further data collection can be prioritized effectively.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | input-output analysis; architecture; Australia; embodied energy; energy paths; residential buildings |
| Index terms: | construction professional, input-output analysis, embodied energy, residential building, Australia, life cycle energy, boundaries, energy requirement |
| Subjects: | Geography, professional development, construction type, property law, energy systems, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here