Winch, G and Carr, B (2001) Benchmarking on-site productivity in France and the UK: A CALIBRE approach. Construction Management and Economics, 19(6), pp. 577-590. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Construction is an increasingly global industry, and benchmarking initiatives that are restricted to a single country run the risk of complacency, as national best practice falls out of line with international best practice. The aim of this article is to report the results of a detailed comparative analysis of the on-site performance of the UK and French divisions of a major UK construction corporation. It focuses on structural concrete because this is potentially a major element in the budget and programme of any construction project, and an area of known French strength. It deploys an innovative computerized productivity measurement tool based on activity sampling, 'CALIBRE', in order to provide detailed comparative data. The results show that the UK productivity performance is poorer than in France, and that the poor UK performance compared with the French is explained by elaborate divisions of labour, lack of investment in plant, and less effective work organization. However, as will be argued in the conclusions, these differences cannot be understood without reference to the overall contracting system and the constraints upon action that it imposes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | activity sampling; benchmarking; France; productivity; sited organization; structural concrete; UK |
| Index terms: | productivity, falls, best practice, sampling, France, programme, comparative analysis, construction project, benchmarking |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, business, project controls, management, health risk and incident analysis, performance measurement, production management, Geography |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Time Control, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here