Resource constrained project scheduling using simulation

Ammar, M A and Mohieldin, Y A (2002) Resource constrained project scheduling using simulation. Construction Management and Economics, 20(4), pp. 323-330. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Resource allocation is one of the most important issues of construction management. Two problems of resource allocation are of concern: resource levelling and resource scheduling. Traditionally, the resource scheduling problem is solved using either heuristic methods or optimization techniques. When heuristic methods are used, resource scheduling is treated as a subsequent problem for the CPM analysis. In this paper, the resource scheduling problem is handled using simulation, where logic dependence and resource availability limits are considered simultaneously during the time scheduling process. Simulation is applied to the resource scheduling problem at the project level. A simulation system called SIRBUS is used to schedule construction projects under resource constraints. Constant resource demand of activities is assumed, and the activity once strated cannot be interrupted. Six example projects solved by different heuristic methods are re-solved using simulation. The results are compared with the latest heuristic models: current float technique and ranked positional weight method. In addition to the advantage that resource availability is considered during time scheduling as a starting point, which is an apparent feature of simulation, SIRBUS gives good results compared with existing heuristic methods.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction management; cpm; resource management; resource scheduling; simulation
Index terms: resource management, resource constraint, resource levelling, scheduling, heuristic, optimization technique, project scheduling, construction project, resource scheduling, resource allocation
Subjects: control systems, production management, operations research, operations management, project controls, algorithms, resource management, risk assessment
Topics: Site Management, Project Management, Risk Management, Time Control, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here