Scheduling system for high rise building construction

Arditi, D; Sikangwan, P and Tokdemir, O B (2002) Scheduling system for high rise building construction. Construction Management and Economics, 20(4), pp. 353-364. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

A computerized system to schedule high-rise building construction has been developed using line-of-balance technology assisted by an expert system. A review of the recent literature on the techniques available for scheduling and controlling construction projects of a repetitive nature shows that Gantt charts are inadequate, and that there are serious problems with using network methods in such circumstances. There is evidence that the construction of high rise buildings has a decidedly repetitive nature but differs in some respects from other repetitive projects such as pipelines or pavement construction. Two new concepts have been introduced into line-of-balance methodology to accommodate the special conditions encountered in high rise building construction. These two concepts, namely 'flexible' unit networks and 'multi-level' LOB diagrams have been coded into a scheduling module ('Lobplans'). A series of databases have been compiled regarding the productivity of resources. An expert system module (Lobex) has been developed to facilitate decision-making at network generation level. The scheduling module, the databases, and the expert system have been organized into an integrated system (Chriss) by means of communication and command routines that interface between the modules and the user input. A 16-storey building project has been used in testing Chriss' performance. The integrated system proved to be user friendly and reliable.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: expert systems; high rise building construction; line-of-balance; linear scheduling methods; networks
Index terms: integrated system, testing, module, productivity, pavement construction, database, repetitive project, pipeline, high-rise building, computerized system, construction project, decision-making, methodology, evidence, expert system, linear scheduling, routine, scheduling
Subjects: professional practice, operations research, design methods, computing systems, construction type, evaluation and assessment methods, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, decision analysis, data management, infrastructure engineering, production management, research methods, management, architectural elements
Topics: Risk Management, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here