Chan, S L (2002) Responses of selected economic indicators to construction output shocks: The case of Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 20(6), pp. 523-533. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The volume of construction output fluctuates in response to changes in demand and supply conditions. Due to the multiple linkages that the construction industry has with other economic sectors and the entire economy, the output shock is propagated through the economic system and reflected in several economic indicators, such as the outputs of other sectors, balance of payments and general prices. A study is reported on the short-term responses of some economic indicators in Singapore following a shock in the construction output, using the Granger causality approach, the impulse response function and variance decomposition analysis. Construction output shock had significant impact on the outputs of the commerce sector and 'other services'. The heavy reliance of the Singapore construction industry on imported inputs has a direct impact on the balance of payments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | balance of payments; construction output shock; prices; responses; sectoral outputs |
| Index terms: | construction output, decomposition analysis, Singapore, variance, linkage, construction industry, economic indicator, commerce |
| Subjects: | operations management, data analysis and analytics, business, asset management, industry analysis, measurement and scaling, Geography |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here