Ford, D N; Lander, D M and Voyer, J J (2002) A real options approach to valuing strategic flexibility in uncertain construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 20(4), pp. 343-351. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
To maximize project value, managers of construction projects must recognize, plan for and strategically manage uncertainty. Current construction planning, estimating, and management practices regarding uncertainty can undervalue projects by failing to exploit opportunities to increase project value, as well as minimize risks. Dynamic uncertainties are described as project conditions that cannot be resolved adequately through improved description or planning for pre-project strategy selection. A real options approach is proposed for proactivity using strategic flexibility to recognize and capture project values hidden in dynamic uncertainties. An example of a proposal for a toll road project demonstrates a method of valuing managerial flexibility to evaluate and select strategies. Impacts of real options in other domains, along with this example, are the basis for concluding that using a structured real options approach in construction management can increase returns through improved project planning and management. Potential impacts of the use of real options are discussed, and challenges in valuing real options in construction projects are identified as the basis for future research.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | project management; project planning; real options; risk management; strategy |
| Index terms: | risk management, management practice, road project, manager, toll, construction planning, project planning, proposal, project strategy, estimating, construction project, project management, real option, strategy |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, management, infrastructure engineering, construction planning, control systems, transportation engineering, production management, economic analysis, project planning, practitioner, project management theory and practice, strategic project management, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Project Management, Site Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here