An assessment of the applicability of partnering in the Turkish construction sector

Koraltan, S B and Dikbas, A (2002) An assessment of the applicability of partnering in the Turkish construction sector. Construction Management and Economics, 20(4), pp. 315-321. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

There are problems associated with the Turkish construction sector; some of these problems are implications of Government policy, restrictions imposed on public construction projects, bureaucratic procedures, contractual clauses incorporating unfair risk sharing and inadequacies in control mechanisms. Some problems can be attributed to inadequate technological knowhow, and/or lack of education and training incentives in new technologies and management approaches. This paper presents findings from research that was aimed at investigating the applicability of partnering in the Turkish construction sector as an alternative approach in seeking solutions to some of the problems within this industry. The findings suggest that the partnering approach could help reduce some of the problems associated with the Turkish construction sector, although the implementation of this approach is likely to face complications, mainly in terms of cultural change requirements and the bureaucracies associated especially with the public construction process. The findings also suggest that if partnering were to be considered for Turkey, the private construction sector would offer more flexibility in the implementation of this approach, rather than reliance on the Government for the introduction of partnering into Turkey.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction sector; construction trends; organizational development; partnering; procurement; Turkey
Index terms: implementation, education and training, government policy, public construction, partnering, Turkey, new technology, cultural change, construction sector, organizational development, face
Subjects: Geography, partnership management, sociology, building construction, professional education, industry analysis, business, psychology, public policy, contractual arrangements, innovation and technology management
Topics: Organizational Design, Education, Governance, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here