Joint risk management through transactionally efficient relational contracting

Rahman, M M (2002) Joint risk management through transactionally efficient relational contracting. Construction Management and Economics, 20(1), pp. 45-54. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The appropriate contracting method and the contract documents for any construction project depend on the nature of the project, but an appropriate contracting method coupled with clear and equitable contract documents do not by themselves ensure project success where people work together in the face of uncertainty and complexity with diverse interests and conflicting agendas. The attitudes of the contracting parties and the co-operative relationships among the project participants are important for successful project delivery. These are examined in the light of transaction cost economics and relational contracting (RC) principles. It is found that RC may well be a useful route towards reduced transaction costs, while also fostering co-operative relationships and better teamwork that in turn facilitate joint risk management (JRM). The usefulness of the latter is reinforced by relevant observations from a recent Hong Kong-based survey, followed by a case study in Mainland China. A basic model is conceptualized for improved project delivery via JRM. This is also seen to be reinforceable by further transactional efficiencies that can be achieved through other RC-based approaches, such as partnering or alliancing.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: co-operative teamwork; joint risk management; project delivery; relational contracting; transaction cost economics
Index terms: complexity, China, contract document, contracting method, construction project, survey, face, transaction cost, operative, project delivery, risk management, contracting party, teamwork, project success, case study, efficiency, Hong Kong, partnering, relational contracting, alliancing
Subjects: systems engineering, financial analysis, partnership management, project management theory and practice, production management, contractual condition, Geography, performance management, management, project delivery, contractual arrangements, psychology, practitioner, data collection methods, risk assessment
Topics: Quality Management, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here