Schultmann, F and Rentz, O (2002) Scheduling of deconstruction projects under resource constraints. Construction Management and Economics, 20(5), pp. 391-401. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
In many countries a large part of the building stock will have to be maintained, renovated, rehabilitated or even removed in the next few decades. Although profitability will be one of the major requirements to be met when these works are carried out, there will be more and more emphasis on the environmental requirements to be respected. To make the modernization of the building stock more efficient, dismantling with the aim of producing high quality recycling materials at reasonable costs is a promising approach. This paper presents an integrated approach to deconstruction site management that focuses on both economic and environmental goals. As a first step, material flow management aims at the closed-loop recycling of various construction materials. In a second step, resource constrained project planning models are used to evaluate strategies for optimized deconstruction site management. The approach offers high flexibility and can be adapted readily to different conditions. Results show that time and cost for deconstruction can be reduced by more than 50%, together with recycling quotas of more than 90%. Even when resources are strictly limited or when strong budget and time restrictions have to be respected, tremendous improvements in deconstruction site management can be achieved.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | deconstruction; optimization; project planning models; scheduling |
| Index terms: | dismantling, resource constraint, recycling, integrated approach, strategy, construction material, site management, scheduling, building stock, profitability, project planning |
| Subjects: | asset management, operations research, operations management, contractual arrangements, waste management, control systems, construction operations, management, economic analysis, building materials |
| Topics: | Site Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Project Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here