Shi, J J (2002) Three methods for verifying and validating the simulation of a construction operation. Construction Management and Economics, 20(6), pp. 483-491. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
A simulation model must be verified to confirm that it describes correctly its intended real world process under study; moreover, the simulation results obtained must be a valid representation of the process. This study presents three activity-based white-box methods for assisting a user in verifying and validating construction simulations. The first method reports a simulation by listing all activities in the chronological order of their executions, so that a user can contrast the simulated progress against the actual progress in the real world. The second method summarizes the operating counts and mean durations of all activities over the simulated time period, to enable a user to evaluate whether all activities have been executed correctly during simulation. The third method generates an activity cycle report for any selected resource entity, so that a user can examine whether the entity is moving in the correct logical and chronological order during simulation. The three methods can be used jointly to debug a simulation model, so as to confirm that the simulation is correctly conducted and the obtained results are valid. The three methods are implemented in a simulation system in the form of corresponding reports. A concreting process is employed to illustrate these methods.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | computer simulation; construction planning; construction process; simulation modelling; simulation of construction operations; validation; verification |
| Index terms: | construction planning, construction simulation, computer simulation, validation, concreting, construction process, duration, construction operation, simulation modelling |
| Subjects: | professional development, construction planning, modelling and simulation, project controls, building construction, construction operations, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Information Management, Time Control, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here