Williams, T P (2002) Predicting completed project cost using bidding data. Construction Management and Economics, 20(3), pp. 225-235. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Neural network and regression models have been developed to predict the completed cost of competitively bid highway projects constructed by the New Jersey Department of Transportation. Bid information was studied for inclusion as inputs to the models. Data studied included the low bid, median bid, standard deviation of the bids, expected project duration and the number of bids. A natural log transformation of the data was found to improve the linear relationship between the low bid and completed cost. The stepwise regression procedure was applied, and yielded the best performing predictive model. This regression model used only the natural log of the low bid as independent variable to predict the natural log of the completed cost. Radial basis neural networks were also constructed to predict the final cost. The best performing regression model produced superior predictions to the best performing neural network model. Hybrid models that used a regression model prediction as an input to a neural network were also studied and were found to also produce reasonable predictions. The calculated models produced good predictions of the completed project cost, but were found to be deficient in predicting very large cost increases. Simple models using the natural log of the low bid as input produced the best results. From the analysis it may be concluded that additional information about the variability of the bids submitted does not provide useful information for predicting the final project outcome.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bidding; neural networks; project costs; regression analysis |
| Index terms: | deviation, independent variable, transformation, project outcome, regression model, duration, regression analysis, variability, highway construction, neural network, project cost, New Jersey, bidding, cost increase |
| Subjects: | civil engineering, economics, Geography, project controls, statistical analysis, business, project completion, artificial intelligence, bidding, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Time Control, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here