Acar, E and Yalçın, N (2019) Task-related pro-environmental behaviours of architectural designers: LEED-based evidence from Turkey. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 15(2), pp. 121-140. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry significantly contributes to environmental degradation through material and energy flows and a huge amount of waste generation as a result of the demolition and refurbishment of buildings. Evidence from environmental psychology literature suggests that being informed about environmental problems does not automatically translate to pro-environmental behaviour (PEB). Clarifying the profiles and perspectives of designers who tend to display low- and high-PEB can provide insights for developing environmental intervention strategies. A questionnaire was designed and delivered to the members of Istanbul Chamber of Architects (CAT). Hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to classify respondents as relatively low-PEB and relatively high-PEB designers, where PEB was operationalized by the self-reported adoption and implementation of LEED criteria in projects within the past 10 years. Following the classification of design professionals according to PEB scores, quantitative data from 274 respondents and qualitative data from 95 respondents were analysed respectively. Keeping other factors constant, findings suggest that the predictive power of awareness about pro-environmental practices in the business domain appears stronger when compared with that of general awareness of people about environmental problems. Apart from contributing to a theoretical understanding of PEB at the workplace, findings provide insights into developing target-group-specific intervention strategies, as they indicate that being technically informed may more easily translate to PEB in the business setting if appropriate motivational incentives are used and continuing professional development programs are designed, especially for the low-PEB designers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architects; business domain; LEED; pro-environmental behaviour; sustainable design |
| Index terms: | designer, intervention strategy, general awareness, waste generation, Turkey, sustainable design, architectural designer, environmental degradation, continuing professional development, implementation, psychology, Istanbul, architect, questionnaire, evidence, pro-environmental behaviour, program, cluster analysis |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, environmental behaviour, environmental impact, profession, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, behavioral psychology, sociology, Geography, financial risk, design process, professional development, software systems |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Procurement, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here