Yasamis, F; Arditi, D and Mohammadi, J (2002) Assessing contractor quality performance. Construction Management and Economics, 20(3), pp. 211-223. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
This paper proposes a radical change in industry practice that will improve the quality of the construction process and the levels of customer satisfaction derived from it by evaluating the quality performance of the contractor. An alternative theory is developed of what constitutes quality, client satisfaction, performance, and their interrelationships in the context of the construction industry. It should be noted here that the term construction client includes both the owner (i.e. the agency or organization funding the project) and the end-user of the construction (i.e. the general public). A comprehensive view of construction quality is proposed that deals with both the service (as received by the owner) and product (as received by the end-user) aspects of the construction project as well as the corporate quality culture. Such a dissection of construction activity facilitates developing strategies to define, operationalize, measure and improve construction quality. A framework for the assessment of a contractor's quality performance is established. This involves gathering a list of contractor quality performance (CQP) indicators that are derived from various quality-related practices of the contractor at the corporate and project level. Finally, a contractor quality performance (CQP) evaluation model is introduced that can be used in a contractor prequalification and/or selection system. The CQP indicators are operationalized within the theoretical framework of the CQP evaluation model.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractor quality performance; contractor selection; prequalification; quality assurance; quality control |
| Index terms: | strategy, quality assurance, construction process, construction project, agency, construction quality, contractor selection, owner, construction activity, construction client, quality performance, funding, customer satisfaction, client satisfaction, quality control, construction industry |
| Subjects: | construction operations, project delivery, economic analysis, client relations, practitioner, building construction, sociology, industry analysis, quality assurance, management, tendering, production management, service delivery |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Quality Management, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here