Arditi, D and Lee, D E (2003) Assessing the corporate service quality performance of design-build contractors using quality function deployment. Construction Management and Economics, 21(2), pp. 175-185. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The design-build (D/B) project delivery system has gained increased market share in the last few years. It is superior to traditional systems in some respects but some claim that it does not lend itself to effective quality assurance and control. D/B construction owners who are in the process of selecting a D/B firm for a project should therefore be well informed about the quality performance of potential D/B firms in their bidding list. Total quality consists of the corporate quality culture, the quality of the project service, and the quality of the constructed facility. This paper describes a tool that was developed to measure the corporate service quality of a D/B firm using quality function deployment (QFD). The service quality factors are ranked relative to construction owners' needs and expectations by means of a survey administered to construction owners. The components of quality management systems in place in D/B firms are ranked by D/B executives in a survey administered to senior D/B firms. The relationships between service quality factors and quality system requirements are established by a professional quality system assessor and all these attributes are integrated into one system called the Corporate Service 'House of Quality.' The tool developed can be used by construction owners to rank D/B firms relative to corporate service quality as well as by D/B firms to benchmark themselves against their competitors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design-build contracts; quality function deployment; quality management; service quality |
| Index terms: | owner, market share, project delivery, quality management, quality function deployment, executive, quality management system, quality performance, design-build contractor, quality assurance, survey, house of quality, bidding, service quality |
| Subjects: | quality assurance, market analysis, sociology, performance measurement, bidding, project delivery, quality function deployment, practitioner, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here