Strategic groups and firm performance: The case of Spanish house-building firms

Claver, E; Molina, J F and Tarí, J J (2003) Strategic groups and firm performance: The case of Spanish house-building firms. Construction Management and Economics, 21(4), pp. 369-377. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

A central theme in strategic management is the theoretical relationship between strategic groups and firm performance. However, the empirical evidence is conflicting. The aim of this research is to study this linkage by examining business strategies in the Spanish construction industry. This paper defines several groups based on Porter's generic strategies of 88 house-building firms, and studies performance differences between groups. The empirical findings demonstrate that significant differences in performance do not exist among groups. Implications of this research for Porter's generic strategies in construction are then discussed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: competitive strategy; construction industry; firm performance; strategic groups
Index terms: evidence, strategic management, competitive strategy, strategy, business strategy, building firm, construction industry, firm performance, linkage
Subjects: industry analysis, business analysis, management, economic analysis, organization, business, evaluation and assessment methods
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here