Exploring the benefits of structured information with the use of virtual design and construction principles in a BIM life-cycle approach

Andersen, M T and Findsen, A L (2019) Exploring the benefits of structured information with the use of virtual design and construction principles in a BIM life-cycle approach. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 15(2), pp. 83-100. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Building information modelling (BIM) is well established in Denmark. However, there has been a lack of focus on the value that can be generated by using BIM during the design and construction phase. In this paper we address the questions: how will a design strategy as a concept look? and, what added value does a more structured and pragmatic work method add to the use of BIM throughout design and construction processes? A literature review established the main areas to further address through a case study method. Two cases were used, a live project and a theoretical project developed by students with the participation of the researchers as teachers. The outcome was to develop a pragmatic design strategy that is as uncomplicated as possible, but can lead a digital construction process and BIM project through the design phases and into the construction and O&M phases with the use of structured data and information from the models in an interdisciplinary manner. In order to develop a common language and understanding about the digital construction process, a paradigm for a BIM roadmap was also further developed. The work also discovers and investigates how an academic institution can develop work methods through on-going development, tests and evaluation in collaboration with practitioners from the AEC industry. The work has theoretical and practical implications.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: BIM process roadmap; digital construction knowledge; location-based scheduling; structured information; virtual design and construction
Index terms: case study, scheduling, design and construction, digital construction, Denmark, paradigm, building information modelling, virtual design and construction, collaboration, literature review, added value, practitioner, design phase, design strategy
Subjects: information systems, digital design, design methods, education and knowledge transfer, operations research, data collection methods, economic analysis, Geography, management, practitioner, contractual arrangements, professional practice, data analysis and analytics
Topics: Procurement, Time Control, Research Practice, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here